 |
 |
Submitted by: Anonymous |
 |
Comments: 17 (Read/Post) |
 |
 |
|
 |
Shaq and his SUV. |
|
 |
|
  |
|
|
Posted by: Trooper |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
|
#1
|
11-10-2004 @ 09:46:45 PM
|
| Posted
By: 427 Vette |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| Shaq has some bad taste in cars, his custom SUVs are terrible. |
|
|
#3
|
11-11-2004 @ 10:38:43 AM
|
| Posted
By: Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Take a look the Dub Magazine site. BLING XTREME.
[Edited by Sensekhmet on 11-11-2004 @ 10:38:55 AM] |
|
|
#4
|
11-11-2004 @ 03:25:02 PM
|
| Posted
By: hooligan |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You know what's funny? Next to him, that Navigator looks like an Aviator.
And I can't begin to say how inappropriate that wing is on an SUV... |
|
|
#5
|
11-12-2004 @ 02:37:38 AM
|
| Posted
By: DOMEZTIK |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| At least it doesn't have the all too common spinners! |
|
|
#6
|
11-13-2004 @ 12:46:13 AM
|
| Posted
By: musclecar |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| I guess when you have gobs of money, you can afford to do a lot of stupid shit to your car, but should you??? |
|
|
#7
|
11-13-2004 @ 09:45:33 PM
|
| Posted
By: Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #6 No, unfortunately this is just another example of too much money/not enough brains. I guess he figures if he messes up this one, he can just buy six more. |
|
|
#9
|
2-25-2006 @ 04:57:26 AM
|
| Posted
By: 4X4 Man |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Those elephant sized SUVs are getting to become a really annoying fad. I'm perfectly happy with my Jeep ZJ, why do I need a something like a Chevy Subrurban (or Navigator for that matter) to protect my ONLY child?!
[Edited by 4X4 Man on 2-25-2006 @ 04:58:10 AM] |
|
|
#10
|
2-25-2006 @ 11:55:35 AM
|
| Posted
By: Gearcat |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| Funny thing is, with a body on frame construction, these SUVs have been found to be just as dangerous to it's occupants in a collision because the impact is carried through the entire vehicle whereas a small unit body construction vehicle will absorb the impact. The unit body car may substain more body damage, but less of the impact reaches the occupants. When you add the added instance of rollover to the SUVs, it all kind of evens out. |
|
|
#11
|
2-25-2006 @ 05:46:09 PM
|
| Posted
By: Turrboenvy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #10, Evens out? Large SUVs and pickups are less safe for their occupants than a well-designed car is, sure. But add to that the fact that they are far more deadly for the occupants of the vehicles they plow into, and their just a deadly proposition. |
|
|
#12
|
2-26-2006 @ 05:11:45 PM
|
| Posted
By: Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| No matter what you're driving , if you hit a semi truck or a train at a crossing, you're dead either way , so there is no magical "vehicle "A" is safer than "B" " rule that applies accross the board, no matter what you drive, you can kill yourself dead with it by being stupid. |
|
|
#13
|
2-27-2006 @ 01:25:15 AM
|
| Posted
By: 4X4 Man |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #13, Ain't that true. Even an Enzo Ferrari owner on Wreckedexotics was not saved by the carbon fiber shell. :-( |
|
|
#14
|
2-27-2006 @ 09:14:17 AM
|
| Posted
By: Turrboenvy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, Talkin' to yourself?
#12, Of course not, but large vehicles increase the danger for people in smaller vehicles. Some redneck's suburban powertrip could mean the end of my life. |
|
|
#16
|
2-27-2006 @ 01:38:13 PM
|
| Posted
By: 4X4 Man |
Reply | Edit | Del |
LOL, I meant to call out to #12. ;-)
[Edited by 4X4 Man on 2-27-2006 @ 01:38:27 PM] |
|
|
#17
|
3-01-2006 @ 01:18:18 AM
|
| Posted
By: Camaro Trooper |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| I guess you lose your mind when you make this kind of money, you start doing dumb shit like this SUV, reminds me of an old ricer fad back in the 60s or 70s (either way before my time) The Van Craze when everybody was pimping out their Vans, funny how history repeats itself in a different manner. |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
