 |
 |
Submitted by: Robocop Ticketed:  |
 |
Comments: 40 (Read/Post) |
 |
 |
|
 |
With that GT-R badge and airplane wing on the back this guy must be the envy of every Mustang owner in San Francisco. |
|
 |
|
   |
|
|
Make/Model: Ford Mustang Posted by: Trooper |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
|
#22
|
5-15-2003 @ 01:16:16 AM
|
| Posted
By: johnny kraut |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| i dont know much about mustangs, but i thought they actually said mustang GT on the roll pan, if they were infact a gt. like i said, i am just guessing, so take it easy if i'm wrong:P |
|
|
#23
|
5-15-2003 @ 05:59:02 PM
|
| Posted
By: SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #22, I thought so as well, but later I figured that single exhaust = non-GT, dual exhaust = GT . . . at least, on the most recent Mustang platform. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. (Of course, who's to say that some retards don't just put dual exhaust on their V6-powered Mustangs?) |
|
|
#24
|
5-16-2003 @ 09:29:19 PM
|
| Posted
By: stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #23, in stock form yes, you can. also one the SN-95s if it has the horse with 3 bars badge its a V6 |
|
|
#25
|
5-17-2003 @ 12:35:52 PM
|
| Posted
By: SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| I've also seen a few mustangs that looked like they had cheesy base trim wheels and tires, but exhaust on both sides emerging from a rectangular outlet just in front of the rear wheels...Is this is an aftermarket add-on? |
|
|
#26
|
5-17-2003 @ 03:50:36 PM
|
| Posted
By: solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| yes, it's called side exit exhaust. and what if I may ask is "retarded" about putting dual exhaust on a V engine? |
|
|
#27
|
5-18-2003 @ 01:06:22 AM
|
| Posted
By: SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
V-6 engine. 6 cylinders. the lame one. the one that takes a heavy Mustang to 60 in 9 seconds. the people that buy V6 Mustangs usually buy them with automatics. Unless you're planning an engine swap, there's not much of a chance of being too incredibly fast in such a heavy car.
speaking of "V" in general, does it tick anyone else off when people refer to four-cylinder engines as "V4's?" How did this get started? "I-4" is the correct abbreviation. "V-4's" are found in weird cars like old Saabs and stuff. |
|
|
#28
|
5-18-2003 @ 06:32:37 AM
|
| Posted
By: Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#27, The current incarnation of the V6 engine that they put in the Mustangs is not the same as the 140-150 hp version that used to take around 9 seconds to hit 60. They're around 190 hp now, and have a constant ~200 lb-ft of torque from 2500-5500 RPM, which really isn't bad when you consider that they idle at around 750-900, and the redline is 5500.
Sure, it's still not super-fast, but with a manual transmission, you can at least shift in such a way that it stays within its powerband (the automatic shifts way too early at part-throttle). |
|
|
#29
|
5-18-2003 @ 01:44:02 PM
|
| Posted
By: solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #27, you didn't awnser my question, what is wrong with dual exhaust on a V engine? |
|
|
#30
|
5-18-2003 @ 09:07:42 PM
|
| Posted
By: SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #29, nothing at all dude, chill out. just seems to me like quite a waste, 'tis all. even if you're driving one, hell, you've got a better car than i do, especially if it's a convertible. |
|
|
#31
|
5-20-2003 @ 12:59:05 AM
|
| Posted
By: johnny kraut |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #27 I-4 isnt always the correct abbreviation (ex. subaru's 4 cylinder engines) |
|
|
#32
|
5-20-2003 @ 03:56:27 PM
|
| Posted
By: SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31 - whoops, forgot about Subaru, which would be abbreviated as F-4, or "Flat Four," or "Boxster" or whatever...
For some reason though, guys keep asking if my Saturn is a "V4" It bothers me....so I told them it was a "Gas Turbine" or a "Wankel" and a few of them nodded their heads in agreeance and told me that their uncle had one or something |
|
|
#33
|
5-20-2003 @ 06:11:15 PM
|
| Posted
By: Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #32, And then don't forget about the Audi and Volvo 5 cylinder engines. :-P |
|
|
#34
|
5-20-2003 @ 06:52:49 PM
|
| Posted
By: SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| yeah, an odd number of cylinders just never seems right to me, but, I guess they get the job done. |
|
|
#35
|
5-21-2003 @ 06:44:32 PM
|
| Posted
By: Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #32, I was under the impression that "flat 4" engines would be repersented by an "H" - similiar to the patteren. |
|
|
#36
|
5-21-2003 @ 10:29:57 PM
|
| Posted
By: SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #35, also possible, just as I4 can be represented as L4, but, "V4" remains confusing and irritating |
|
|
#37
|
6-13-2003 @ 01:30:19 AM
|
| Posted
By: Rikadyn |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #16, why do they ruin american cars with Japanese badges...their aren't as many american fake badges available from pepboys...and they still hope ppl don't know what a Skyline GT-R is... |
|
|
#39
|
6-18-2004 @ 03:03:03 PM
|
| Posted
By: precico |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| The wing is on recall ..............pass it on............GTR ....dont lie......... |
|
|
#40
|
10-11-2006 @ 11:59:23 AM
|
| Posted
By: 99neon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| This doesn't really pertain to this car, but yesterday, I saw a late model Caprice with frickin Altezzas on it. When will the madness stop!? |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
