 |
 |
|
 |
Comments: 28 (Read/Post) |
 |
 |
|
 |
I was driving by the fortress of solitude the other day and ran into Superman's car.. unfortunately I didn't have any tickets. But I did have my camera, so I took a few pictures. |
|
 |
|
   |
|
|
Make/Model: Toyota Echo Posted by: Trooper |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
|
#1
|
12-01-2004 @ 01:47:48 PM
|
| Posted
By: Cobra Kid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| How could Superman with all those cool powers be unable to get a better car than this POS? |
|
|
#3
|
12-01-2004 @ 03:11:34 PM
|
| Posted
By: IH8RICERS |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| I thought superman could fly/run faster than sound, why would he drive |
|
|
#5
|
2-10-2005 @ 06:41:10 PM
|
| Posted
By: IloveV8s |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| that is by far the ugliest stock car ever, aside from the subaru baja, but that's a given. |
|
|
#6
|
2-10-2005 @ 07:11:11 PM
|
| Posted
By: 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| havent seen many cars have you? Aztek, taurus, avalanche.... the list goes on. |
|
|
#8
|
2-11-2005 @ 08:49:27 PM
|
| Posted
By: IloveV8s |
Reply | Edit | Del |
[Edited by IloveV8s on 2-11-2005 @ 08:49:48 PM] |
|
|
#9
|
2-11-2005 @ 09:01:36 PM
|
| Posted
By: Gearcat |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The Echo looks like it was in a high speed rear end accident in the designing process and they just left it that way. Echos are ugly. They should have just stuck with an evolution of the Tercel.
[Edited by Gearcat on 2-11-2005 @ 09:01:54 PM] |
|
|
#10
|
2-11-2005 @ 10:51:57 PM
|
| Posted
By: autocar |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, who says bajas or avalanches are ugly? ok bajas are weird and avalanches need at least a 4 inch body lift and 35's but still
|
|
|
#11
|
2-11-2005 @ 10:53:02 PM
|
| Posted
By: autocar |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5 and 6, who says bajas or avalanches are ugly? ok bajas are weird and avalanches need at least a 4 inch body lift and 35's, but compared to the new honda ridgeline they are works of art
[Edited by autocar on 2-11-2005 @ 10:56:17 PM] |
|
|
#12
|
2-11-2005 @ 10:57:42 PM
|
| Posted
By: autocar |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| sorry for the double post im quite not sure what just happend |
|
|
#13
|
2-12-2005 @ 07:32:44 PM
|
| Posted
By: 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #11, the 1/2 ton of plastic on the sides say so. and the rest of the truck. this is compared to 99.9% of all cars. they are ugly as a green civic |
|
|
#14
|
2-12-2005 @ 07:59:41 PM
|
| Posted
By: autocar |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| the avalanche would look better with alot less plastic but its a pretty big truck i think it can handle it.at least the plastic is well placed compared to say, a honda pilot |
|
|
#15
|
2-12-2005 @ 08:00:51 PM
|
| Posted
By: IloveV8s |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| the Avalanche is definitely a peice of shit... that plastic? it was proven during test drives from a magazine that it falls off during offroading, and yes "autocar"... even with a 4" body lift and 35s.... |
|
|
#16
|
2-12-2005 @ 08:07:33 PM
|
| Posted
By: autocar |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| #13 & 15, go to chevy.com, you can get an Avalanche without the body clading. i never said i really liked it, i just think there are a lot of uglier cars on the road. also #15, any one who wheels an Avalanche, especialy a stock one is a complete retard |
|
|
#19
|
2-12-2005 @ 11:48:16 PM
|
| Posted
By: Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
| I think the Avalanche isn't too bad with the right set of rims and without all that damn plastic. But what really makes my stomach turn is that Honda Element and that stupid Scion XB thing. When did the cardboard box style come back? |
|
|
#20
|
2-12-2005 @ 11:51:58 PM
|
| Posted
By: moparman |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, If you'd be a retard for wheelin it whats the point of buying 4 wheel drive? Also its just a yuppie truck.
[Edited by moparman on 2-12-2005 @ 11:56:42 PM] |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
